Navigating the academic job market can be confusing, especially when it comes to tenure-track and non-tenure-track positions. With varying titles across institutions, it's easy to get lost. Let's clarify the differences so you can confidently pursue the right career path.
When considering a career as a lab director in an academic setting, it's essential to understand the different tracks available and how they influence your role, responsibilities, and professional development. Academic positions come in various tracks, primarily tenure and non-tenure tracks, each with its own set of expectations and focus areas. This post delves into these distinctions, helping prospective lab directors navigate their career paths.
1. Tenure-Track Positions
Tenure track positions are highly coveted and typically emphasize research as a cornerstone of the role. Some lab directors may be on the tenure track, where the primary focus is on advancing scientific knowledge and contributing to the academic institution’s research portfolio while also serving in clinical roles, such as case sign-out.
· Work Efforts:
In a tenure track position, research efforts usually constitute over 70% of the job. Faculty members in tenure track are expected to lead groundbreaking research projects, secure grants, and publish in high-impact journals like other research faculty members. Therefore, this heavy research emphasis often means that clinical service responsibilities are minimal, usually less than 30%. This setup is typically suited for those who wish to balance research work and clinical service, with the majority of their effort directed toward research.
· Career Path:
Tenure track roles offer a clear path to job security and academic freedom, culminating in tenure—a permanent appointment that reflects the institution’s commitment to the faculty member’s contributions. Achieving tenure is a rigorous process that requires demonstrating excellence in research, teaching, and service, with a strong focus on research achievements.
2. Non-Tenure Track Positions: Clinical Related Track & Technical Director Position
Non-tenure track positions offer more diversity in focus areas, typically divided into clinical educator tracks and clinical tracks. These roles are crucial in academic settings, providing essential clinical services while also contributing to the institution's educational and research missions.
· Clinical Educator Track:
Positions within the clinical educator track prioritize both clinical service and education. Over 70% of the role is dedicated to these combined efforts, with lab directors involved in significant teaching responsibilities, mentoring trainees, and contributing to the institution’s educational goals. The remaining 30% of the time is allocated to other duties, such as research and administrative tasks.
· Clinical Track:
The clinical track is even more focused on clinical service, with 80-90% of the role dedicated to this area. Lab directors in this track are primarily responsible for overseeing the clinical laboratory, ensuring accurate and timely test results, and maintaining high standards of patient care. Only 10-20% of their time is devoted to other activities, such as teaching, research, or administrative responsibilities. The work of clinical track lab directors is very similar to that of directors in commercial labs.
· Job Titles and Responsibilities:
Job titles and specific responsibilities can vary significantly across institutions. A typical position for a clinical lab geneticist with board certification might be labeled as "lab director" or "medical director," with the primary responsibility of signing out genetic test results. In some institutions, these roles may be referred to as "technical director," although the responsibilities might be similar. It's important to note that some institutions reserve the titles "lab director" or "medical director" exclusively for individuals with an MD. Therefore, even though LGG board-certified lab geneticists also sign out clinical cases, the position title could be different, such as "technical director" or something else.
3. Technical Director Positions
While often considered part of the non-tenure track, technical director positions have a unique focus. Unlike lab or medical directors, who are primarily involved in clinical service, technical directors concentrate on the research and development (R&D) of genetic testing methodologies.
· R&D Focus:
Technical directors are at the forefront of developing new genetic tests, validating assays, and ensuring that the laboratory stays at the cutting edge of technology. They also handle QA/QC for genetic testing due to their technical expertise. This role typically requires a strong background in genetics and laboratory science, although LGG board certification might be preferred or seen as an advantage rather than a requirement.
· Clarifying Expectations:
Given the variability in job titles and responsibilities, it is crucial for candidates to engage with recruiting personnel—usually division directors or section chiefs—to clarify the expectations and scope of the role. Understanding these nuances can help ensure that your career trajectory aligns with your professional goals and interests. Remember, some institutions refer to LGG board-certified lab geneticists with a PhD who sign out clinical cases as a "technical director."
In Summary
Navigating the academic landscape as a lab director requires a clear understanding of the different tracks and their associated responsibilities. Whether you are drawn to the research-intensive tenure track, the clinically-focused non-tenure track, or the innovative world of technical directorship, knowing the distinctions between these roles is key to making informed career decisions. Always engage with recruiting personnel to ensure that the position you’re considering aligns with your career aspirations and offers the opportunities you seek.
Comments